Traffic Cameras
Home Up

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado    El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson  *  Attorney at Law  *  Colorado Springs
WELCOME
perhaps I will become your attorney
COLORADO SPRINGS TRAFFIC CAMERAS

Email Attorney 

Attorney Vita

Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003  **  Toll Free (800) 410-1002
Hours Consultation Terms Retainer Documents Directions Maps Travel * Trade Area
 

COLORADO SPRINGS TRAFFIC CAMERAS
Public Benefit or Intrusion?  Ladar?

ATTORNEY HOMEPAGE

COLORADO SPRINGS TRAFFIC DEFENSE
Attorney Trial Practice 29+ years Colorado State Courts, Colorado Springs Municipal Court & Colorado DMV License Hearings & Appeals

Traffic Cams - Benefits and Links

Automated Traffic Enforcement
Traffic Cameras - "Gotcha"
Intersection and I-25 Cameras
Security  vs  Privacy Infringement
 
Warning Right to Silence Search & Seizure Demeanor
Criminal Court Proceedings Felony Misdemeanor Municipal
Traffic Court Proceedings Traffic Infraction Traffic Offense Municipal
Deferred Sentencing Sentencing Defense  Criminal  *  Traffic  *  DMV
Traffic Definitions Bail Bond Remedial Links Completion Forms
Self Legal Research Accounting Legal Forms On-Line * Hardcopy
Retainer Docs Client Docs Laymen Advice Disclaimer Notice
Independent Service Providers Alternatives Find A Lawyer
Useful Public Service Remedial Traffic Safety Classes
ATTORNEY POLICIES
  Cases Outside Colorado Springs - Travel
 No Pro Bono Assistance  *  No Installment Payment
 Legal Advice Limited to Clients - Not General Public
 Representation Now - Another Attorney or Self
 Attorney Representation & Declined Matters
 No Post Sentencing - Revocation or Appeal
attorney does not accept criminal & traffic cases after sentencing unless he defended the underlying case
non-acceptance includes probation revocation, deferred sentence revocation, parole violation or appeal  **  eligible collateral attack cases accepted
 

Adobe Acrobat Reader version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files    Free Download

TRAFFIC CAMS - BENEFIT AND LINKS
 

        Regarding those convenient traffic cams that tell us traffic conditions on I-25 and intersections within the city...

 

        Many of us have become accustomed to taking a quick look at traffic conditions before we head out on our morning or evening commute due to construction on the I-25 corridor in Colorado Springs and the congestion at the Woodmen / I-25 interchange.  In such circumstances, the technology and cams are appreciated because we may save time and aggravation.

 
Colorado Statewide Traffic Cams
Colorado DOT Website
Colorado Springs Local Traffic Cams
City of Colorado Springs Website

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
Traffic Cameras - Photographic or Video - "Gotcha"

        Would Colorado really dream of employing robotic apprehension of its truly dangerous citizenry?  

        Oh yeah, before the cameras were installed, Colorado enacted automated traffic enforcement laws.
                CRS 42-4-110.5  It's called AVIS - not the car rental company, but Automated Vehicle Identification System, and it has been enacted as law in Colorado.
                Colorado Springs Municipal Code §10.17.114: Owner Liability for Traffic Signal Camera Violations - repealed as of 9/8/08

        See also - 86 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL REVIEW 25, No. 05 (May 2007)
                issuance of traffic tickets - PRESUMPTION OF GUILT and due process

        Then dispute arose over who gets to regulate this marvelous system of potential revenue and bad guy gotcha.

        The cities of Commerce City, Westminster, Fort Collins, and Colorado Springs (cities), each home-rule municipalities under Article XX of the Colorado Constitution, challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions of section 42-4-110.5 and section 42-3-112(14) regulating the use in Colorado of automated vehicle identification systems, popularly known as photo radar and photo red light.  City of Commerce City v. State, 40 P.3d 1273 (Colo. 2002)

        The cities argued that certain provisions of section [7] 42-4-110.5 and section 42-3-112(14) unconstitutionally infringe on their home-rule powers because Article XX, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution unambiguously reserves to the Cities the power to enforce local traffic ordinances and operate municipal courts. The Cities did not argue that all of the restrictions placed on home-rule cities by the state legislation violate their home-rule powers, rather they challenged the following: (1) the ninety day service provision for traffic violations detected by AVIS[fn3]; (2) the requirement that an entity using AVIS post a sign in a conspicuous place before each area in which AVIS are used notifying the public of their use[fn4]; (3) the provision that an entity using AVIS mail warnings to first-time violators who have been identified by automated systems if the drivers were detected speeding at a rate less than ten miles over a reasonable speed limit[fn5]; (4) the provision establishing a forty-dollar maximum fine for speeding violations detected by AVIS[fn6]; (5) the provision establishing an eighty-dollar maximum fine for AVIS-detected speeding violations in school zones[fn7]; (6) the provision establishing a seventy-five dollar maximum penalty for red light violations detected by AVIS[fn8]; (7) the provision limiting the method by which an entity using automated systems may contract with AVIS vendors and manufacturers for the use or acquisition of AVIS equipment[fn9]; and (8) the prohibition against access to state records — which are needed to determine the identity and address of the registered owner of a motor vehicle involved

        The Supreme Court again recognized that advances in technology, which have significantly changed the nature of the enforcement of traffic laws, increased the need for uniformity of AVIS regulation. In fact, the use of automated systems for traffic control represents such a considerable shift in traffic enforcement that these systems alter Colorado citizens' basic expectations about how they will be ticketed for traffic violations. Before the use of automated systems, drivers who violated traffic laws expected to be stopped and issued a citation at the time of the violation or immediately following it. This served the important purpose of notifying the driver of an alleged violation. In contrast, when cited by an automated system, drivers will not be on immediate notice of an alleged violation. Thus, this new technology significantly alters Colorado drivers' expectations about how traffic violations will be enforced against them. Accordingly, the state has an interest in providing Colorado drivers with uniform AVIS regulations.

        As of September 8, 2008 the City of Colorado Springs does not have the technical capability for automated traffic enforcement.

Colorado Springs
INTERSECTION AND I-25 TRAFFIC CAMERAS

        Colorado Springs has installed small tubular circular cameras at many intersections.  January 15, 2003 in attorney case no. 02-1021 counsel was advised by City Traffic Operations Division as follows regarding intersection cameras:
        only sense the present of a vehicle to trip the stop light cycle, replacing former weight sensors
        do not "snap a picture" when a vehicle enters the intersection on a red light
        do not create any video image (streaming or still) 
        do not record any image to disk or other media, temporary or permanent
        I attempted to procured the evidence in a DUI case where the client denied running the red light - reasonable suspicion for the initial contact.  It was technologically unavailable.

        On September 8, 2008 counsel again sought traffic evidence from the city agency responsible for city wide traffic traffic cameras.
               
Monitoring Agency: Colorado Springs Traffic Engineer's Office, Traffic Management Center, Phone: (719) 385-5966
        two types of cameras are utilized in Colorado Springs
                1.) small tubular cameras (torpedo appearance) and 2.) larger optical cameras which display snap pictures or streaming video
        tubular cameras only sense the present of a vehicle to trip the stop light cycle, replacing former weight sensors
                tubular cameras do not create any video image (streaming or still) - no image is taken or recorded
        neither tubular nor optical cameras "snap a picture" when a vehicle enters the intersection on a red light
        neither tubular nor optical cameras are equipped to retain images or video
                neither type of camera records any image to disk or other media, temporary or permanent
                once the scene image or video has been displayed, including cams displayed on the internet, the image or video is not captured or retained - it's gone
        neither tubular or optical cameras are equipped with radar, vascar, laser or ladar
        all traffic cams are presently used for traffic monitoring & regulation (electronic signage & calls for service), not traffic enforcement

        From defense counsel perspective, recording of traffic cam data would be a double edge sword.  On the one hand, it could provide government with evidence of criminal activity.  Conversely, it could also provide defense counsel with evidence regarding lack of reasonable suspicion for initial contact, accident fault and could verify facts which support theory of defense.  The issue is moot - no such evidence exists as of September 8, 2008.
 

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT - TRAFFIC CAMERAS
relevant links

Local Traffic Cams Automated Traffic Enforcement Traffic Cam Information Colorado Statute DMV Point Structure Traffic Defense

SECURITY vs. PRIVACY INFRINGEMENT

        I understand Boston has installed cameras in the downtown area to monitor crime.  I also understand similar measures have been taken in some Great Britain towns which employ face recognition software.  The cameras are used to monitor persons walking down the street and apprehend those wanted by the law.  This naturally raises serious questions of public security vs. individual freedom and privacy.

        Whether images and subsequent tickets will occur in the future from the I-25 and intersection cam is a question of technology and city / state policy.  Regarding who gets to control apprehension of our unsuspecting citizens by remote control, our fair city contested the state laws enacted by those who possess great (infinite?) wisdom and regulate God's country.  City of Commerce City v. State, supra.  Draw your own conclusions about city and state policy.  As the song goes: I fought the law, and the law won.

        What's next - close your curtains to avoid "Peeping Tom" government cameras in our neighborhoods?
        .... or will the cameras be infrared so we can't close the blinds to invoke the "privacy" of our homes?
        As the Lost in Space robot so aptly stated:  "Warning! Warning! Warning! Danger Will Robinson!"
        The Orwellian 1984 "Big Brother" concept may not be so distant after all.
        Apologies for the diatribe - when it comes to protection of individual rights, defense attorneys tend to be the lone wolf who's voice can be heard crying in the wilderness.

DMV Addresses and Links Driving Abstracts and Records DMV Point Structure On-Line Colorado Driving Records
Driver License & Hearing Defense DMV Appeal Legal Research Selected Statutes & Regs "Red" License & Interlock Devices
Insurance Actions SR-22 Insurance Habitual Traffic Offender Interstate Compact Accident Reports & DMV Forms
DMV Hearing
Defense
DMV Appeal
statute of limitations

Driving in Colorado is a constitutionally protected privilege, but nevertheless a privilege which may be lost.  Multiple statutes can cause loss of driving privileges for different driver behavior.  Drivers are entitled to a DMV hearing.  In some circumstances the right to hearing precedes potential DMV adverse action; under other Colorado traffic laws the adverse order is entered, then the driver is provided notice of the adverse action and right to request subsequent hearing.  If hearing has been held or a DMV final order has otherwise entered and the Colorado driver's license or Colorado driving privileges have been suspended, revoked or denied, the driver's remaining recourse is appeal to the District Court.  DMV appeal is subject to a statute of limitations.  Right to appeal may be lost if the driver delays.  Upon final order in the District Court, either party make take the case on appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals.  Refer to links for information.

CSPD Accident Cold Report    due within 72 hours of accident
obtain hardcopy cold report from CSPD Police Operations Center
State of Colorado On-Line Accident Report
accident report obsolete 8/4/04 unless no officer accident report
 

INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service * laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine

ADVICE BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals & street corner lawyers

TRAFFIC DEFENSE

DUI - DWAI - DEAC  *  Driving Under Restraint  *  No Operator's License  *  Speeding DMV DEFENSE DMV Appeal
Speed Contest - Drag Racing  *  Eluding Police  *  Hit & Run  *  Compulsory Insurance License Hearings * Point Structure * Forms
Reckless Driving - Careless Driving  *    *  Weaving - Roadways Laned for Traffic Habitual Offender  *  Interstate Compact
Minor - Alcohol Red Light - Stop Sign  *  Traffic Definitions  *  Traffic Infraction vs. Crime  *  Traffic Cams Insurance SR-22 Interlock  Driving Records
 

please feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation

DISCLOSURES
Privacy
 
Notice & Disclaimer
 
Ethics & Client Disclosures
 applicable whether site visitor
reads or not

 
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter

PRIMARY WEBSITE

 

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL WEBSITES

DUI DEFENSE - DWAI & DEAC DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE MIP - UNDERAGE ALCOHOL TRAFFIC TICKET DEFENSE DRIVING UNDER RESTRAINT SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
HIT AND RUN DEFENSE DRIVER LICENSE DEFENSE CRIMINAL DEFENSE PROSTITUTION DEFENSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEFENSE
SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS NUISANCE FORFEITURE DEFENSE SHOPLIFTING - THEFT DEFENSE
FAMILY LAW DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE COLORADO DIVORCE LEGAL SEPARATION STEP-PARENT ADOPTION GRANDPARENT ADOPTION
PATERNITY - LEGAL PARENTAGE CHILD SUPPORT SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS DEBT COLLECTION PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

 MAJOR SEARCH ENGINES

All the Web AltaVista AOL Search Ask Jeeves - Teoma Bing - Microsoft Network Dogpile
Excite Google HotBot InfoSeek - Go LookSmart Lycos
Netscape Overture Search WebCrawler Yahoo!  
 

 Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip Codes

80918 80920 80919 80917 80915 80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912 80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945 80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997
 
Colorado traffic cams, traffic cameras, ticket, traffic tickets, ladar, speeding ticket, speeding, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Colorado, court, lawyer, attorney

Website Copyright © 2003 - All Rights Reserved - Document Revised July 22, 2010
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright © Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date: January 29, 2010

Hit Counter