|
Colorado Speeding Ticket Defense - Colorado Springs radar,
vascar, pace clock, visual estimate, evidence of speed, speed trap, aerial or airplane surveillance. Defense of traffic infractions & traffic offenses and Colorado DOR - DMV driver's license suspension revocation or denial
proceedings. Elements of offense and penalties, Colorado state law - maximum lawful speed limit, reasonable and prudent speed, preemption,
Colorado Springs municipal ordinances, traffic engineer's survey, notice - signage requirements, size & placement, velocity and speed conversions,
Municipal Court Colorado Springs Colorado, Manitou Springs Municipal Court,
Woodland Park Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court, Fountain
Municipal Court, Calhan Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Town of Simla Colorado,
Court Simla Colorado, Pueblo Municipal Court, Castle Rock Municipal Court,
Monument Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado, Denver Municipal
Court, Aurora Municipal Court, Brighton Municipal Court, Broomfield Municipal
Court, Centennial Municipal Court, Englewood Municipal Court, Federal Heights
Municipal Court, Golden Municipal Court, Littleton Municipal Court, Sheridan
Municipal Court, Thornton Municipal Court, Wheat Ridge Municipal Court,
WheatRidge Municipal Court
Adobe Acrobat Reader
version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files
Free Download

|
|
| SPEEDING
- COLORADO STATE LAW |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney notation: multiple sections have been omitted or summarized for brevity - refer to
statutes
for full text |
|
|
|
The elements of this offense are driving a motor vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
Special hazards such as snow, rain, construction, or other attendant
circumstances may effect the reasonable and prudent speed.
Maximum
Lawful Speed
Colorado has one lawful speed limit
- 75 miles per hour. All other "speed limits" are merely prima
facie evidence of reasonable and prudent speed. See below
statute.
CRS 42-4-1101(8) ¶¶ (b) & (c)
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
Reasonable
and Prudent Speed
may not be so reasonable or prudent
CRS 42-4-1101(2)
Except when a special hazard exists that requires a lower speed, the following speeds shall be lawful:
(a) Twenty miles per hour on narrow, winding mountain highways or on blind curves;
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour in any business district, as defined in section 42-1-102 (11);
(c) Thirty miles per hour in any residence district, as defined in section 42-1-102 (80);
(d) Forty miles per hour on open mountain highways;
(e) Forty-five miles per hour for all vehicles in the business of transporting trash, where higher speeds are posted, when said vehicle is loaded as an exempted vehicle pursuant to section 42-4-507 (3);
(f) Fifty-five miles per hour on other open highways which are not on the interstate system, as defined in section 43-2-101 (2), and are not surfaced, four-lane freeways or expressways;
(g) Sixty-five miles per hour on surfaced, four-lane highways which are on the interstate system, as defined in section 43-2-101 (2), or are freeways or expressways;
(h) Any speed not in excess of a speed limit designated by an official traffic control device.
CRS 42-4-1101(4)
Any speed in excess of the lawful speeds set forth in CRS 42-4-1101(2) shall be prima facie evidence that such speed was not reasonable or prudent under the conditions then existing.
"Prima facie evidence" means evidence which is sufficient proof that the speed was not reasonable or prudent under the conditions then existing, and which will remain sufficient proof of such fact, unless contradicted and overcome by evidence bearing upon the question of whether or not the speed was reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
That means a rebuttable presumption presumption is created that the maximum safe
speed is that which was designated - but the presumption can be overcome.
No speed limit in Colorado is an absolute speed limit except 75 miles per
hour. CRS 42-4-1101 (7) creates an exception - any city or town may by ordinance adopt absolute speed limits as the maximum lawful speed limits in its
jurisdiction. See preemption below.
So, what does all this jibberish
this mean?
An attack can be made on the
reasonable and prudent "speed limit"
Traffic engineer's office
didn't do a traffic survey when adopting the reasonable and prudent
"speed limit" or the survey was inadequate.
Notice was inadequate
If not properly adopted with a
valid traffic survey and properly posted, the "speed limit"
becomes the absolute speed limit of 75 miles per hour. This may end
the case if the driver's speed is alleged below 75 mph.
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
CRS 42-4-1101(8)
(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, no person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed in excess of a maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour.
(c) The speed limit set forth in paragraph (b) of this subsection (8) is the maximum lawful speed limit and is not subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of this section.
(prima facie evidence of reasonable and prudent speed)
(e) The provisions of this subsection (8) are declared to be matters of both local and statewide concern requiring uniform compliance throughout the state.
(f) In every charge of a violation of paragraph (b) of this subsection (8), the complaint, summons and complaint, or penalty assessment notice shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and also the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour.
(9) The conduct of a driver of a vehicle which would otherwise constitute a violation of this section is justifiable and not unlawful when:
(a) It is necessary as an emergency measure to avoid an imminent public or private injury which is about to occur by reason of a situation occasioned or developed through no conduct of said driver and which is of sufficient gravity that, according to ordinary standards of intelligence and morality, the desirability and urgency of avoiding the injury clearly outweigh the desirability of avoiding the consequences sought to be prevented by this section; or
(b) With respect to authorized emergency vehicles, the applicable conditions for exemption, as set forth in
CRS 42-4-108, exist.
(10) The minimum requirement for commission of a traffic infraction or misdemeanor traffic offense under this section is the performance by a driver of prohibited conduct, which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act which said driver is physically capable of performing.
(11) It shall not be a defense to prosecution for a violation of this section that:
(a) The defendant's conduct was not performed intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence; or
(b) The defendant's conduct was performed under a mistaken belief of fact, including, but not limited to, a mistaken belief of the defendant regarding the speed of the defendant's vehicle; or
(c) The defendant's vehicle has a greater operating or fuel-conserving efficiency at speeds greater than the reasonable and prudent speed under the conditions then existing or at speeds greater than the maximum lawful speed limit.
(12) A violation of driving one to twenty-four miles per hour in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or in excess of the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour is a class A traffic infraction; a violation of driving twenty-five or more miles per hour in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or in excess of the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense; and a violation under subsection (3) of this section is a class A traffic infraction.
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
Preemption
CRS 42-4-1101(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of subsection (2) of this section,
any city or town may by ordinance adopt absolute speed limits as the maximum lawful speed limits in its
jurisdiction, and such speed limits shall not be subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of this section.
CRS 42-4-1101(8)(d) State and local authorities within their respective jurisdictions shall not authorize any speed limit which exceeds seventy-five miles per hour on any highway.
Municipalities and Counties adopt ordinances.
Municipal
Codes or Ordinances
County Codes or
Ordinances
Many smaller towns or
counties with
limited budgets adopt the model traffic code (MTC)
Local authorities may adopt by
reference all or any part of a model traffic code which embodies
the rules of the road and vehicle requirements set forth in state law. CRS
42-4-110(b)
To this attorney's knowledge,
adoption of the MTC does not eliminate the
traffic
survey requirement.
To find the
ordinance in your area, run a search engine such as
Google,
search:
model traffic code and add the name of the town or county
An example
would be
El
Paso County Model Traffic Code
With respect to cities and
towns, the general preemption statute is controlled by the specific exception
contained in CRS 42-4-1101 (7). Cities and towns may adopt absolute speed
limits below 75 miles per hour. If stopped in a small "town"
(Boondocks, USA) which may not be incorporated, it would be worth investigating
whether it qualified as a "town" under the statutes. I've never
had the issue arise, but it would be worth researching the law further if
relevant.
With respect to counties, no
such exception is provided in CRS 42-4-1101 (7). It is this attorney's
belief that counties are preempted from enacting ordinances at variance with
state law, including the inability to adopt a maximum lawful speed below 75
miles per hour.


|
|
| SPEEDING |
|
COLORADO SPRINGS MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attorney notation: multiple sections may have been omitted or summarized for brevity - refer to
ordinances
for full text |
|
10.5.101: REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED; SPECIAL
HAZARDS:
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and hazards, actual and potential, then existing.
B. The fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than the limits established in this chapter shall not relieve the driver of the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians, animals, property or other traffic by reason of weather, traffic, roadway conditions or any other actual or potential hazard then existing. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to decrease speed given the presence of any hazard. (1968 Code §§6-5-1, 6-5-2; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.102 UNPOSTED SPEED LIMITS
Where speed limits are not posted, and where no special hazard exists, the following speed shall be lawful but it shall be unlawful for any person to drive at any speed in excess of the limits:
A. Twenty five (25) miles per hour on streets and highways;
B. Fifteen (15) miles per hour in alleys.
Effective 2003
(1968 Code §§6-5-1, 6-5-2; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42; Ord. 03-49)
This constitutes an amendment from
the former speed limits which are no longer applicable
10.5.103: POSTED SPEED
LIMITS:
A. It is hereby determined that the speed limits stated in section 10.5.102 of this article are the maximum reasonable and safe speed limits in each zone, except where the City Traffic Engineer determines on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any speed limit set forth in section 10.5.102 of this article is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any parts of any street or highway, in which case the Traffic Engineer shall determine and declare a reasonable and safe maximum speed limit not to exceed fifty five (55) miles per hour which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice are erected at the intersection or other place or part of the street or highway.
B. Appropriate signs giving notice that the speed limit set forth in section 10.5.102 of this article is the maximum speed may be posted by the Traffic Engineer.
C. Whenever posted speed limits are established in accord with this section, the speed limits shall be recorded as provided in section 10.1.312 of this chapter.
D. It is hereby determined that the posted speed limits determined, posted and recorded are the maximum reasonable or safe speed limits at the locations.
E. It is hereby determined that the speed of twenty (20) miles per hour is the maximum reasonable and safe speed in school zones, and the Traffic Engineer shall establish speed zones by posting appropriate signs giving notice thereof in lieu of the requirements of this section. (1968 Code §§6-5-2, 6-5-3; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 79-32; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.104: EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED
LIMIT:
It shall be unlawful for any person to drive any vehicle:
A. One to four (4) miles per hour over the posted speed limit;
B. Five (5) to nine (9) miles per hour over the posted speed limit;
C. Ten (10) to nineteen (19) miles per hour over the maximum posted speed limit;
D. Twenty (20) to thirty nine (39) miles per hour over the posted limit;
E. Forty (40) miles per hour or more over the maximum posted speed limit. (Ord. 98-249; Ord. 00-112; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.105: NOTICE CHARGING SPEED
VIOLATION:
In every charge of a violation relating to speed limits, the complaint or summons or notice to appear shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and the speed limit applicable within the district or at the location of the City. (1968 Code §6-5-5; Ord. 77-69; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.106: MINIMUM SPEED
REGULATIONS:
A. No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any street at a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable forward movement of traffic, except when a reduced speed shall be necessary for safe operation of the vehicle or in compliance with law.
B. It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that slow speeds on certain streets described in traffic control records as provided in section 10.1.312 of this chapter consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic on the facilities described in the records and it is declared that the minimum speed limit upon those streets or expressways shall be as stated, which speed so declared shall be effective at the time specified when signs are erected giving notice. Any speed less than the minimum speed limit shall be prima facie evidence that the lesser speed is unlawful, except when a reduced speed shall be necessary for the safe operation of the vehicle when a special hazard exists. (1968 Code §6-5-6; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 85-263; Ord. 88-151; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.107: SPEED
CONTESTS:
A. No person shall engage in any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest or exhibition of speed or acceleration on a street or highway, and no person shall aid or abet in any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest or exhibition on any street.
B. No person shall for the purpose of facilitating or aiding or as an incident to any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest upon a street or public right of way in any manner obstruct or place any barricade, obstruction, starting or timing device or assist or participate in placing any barricade, obstruction, starting or timing device upon any street or public right of way. (1968 Code §6-5-7; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.109: EMERGENCY VEHICLES EXEMPT FROM SPEED LIMITS:
A. The speed limitations set forth in this article shall not apply to an authorized emergency vehicle when the driver is responding to an emergency call and is making use of visual and audible signals as prescribed by law, nor shall speed limitations apply to a police vehicle while in actual pursuit of a suspected violator of any provision of this chapter or any other law so long as the pursuit is being made to obtain verification of or evidence of the guilt of the suspected violator or to apprehend the suspected violator.
B. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons using the street, nor shall the provisions protect the driver of any vehicle from the consequences of a reckless disregard for the safety of others. (1968 Code §6-5-9; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 01-42)
10.5.110:
DEFENSES:
The minimum requirement for commission of a violation of this chapter is the performance by the driver of prohibited conduct, which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act which the driver is physically capable of performing. It shall not be a defense to prosecution for violation of this article that:
A. The defendant's conduct was not performed intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence; or
B. The defendant's conduct was performed under a mistaken belief of fact, including, but not limited to, a mistaken belief regarding the speed of the defendant's vehicle. (Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42)

|
|
Surrounding Area
MUNICIPAL COURTS
SPEEDING TICKET
DEFENSE |
|
TRAVEL TIME & MILEAGE
Billed Outside El Paso County |
|
Southern Colorado |
Metro Denver Area |
Colorado
Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Colorado Springs, Colorado |
Calhan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Calhan, Colorado |
Denver City & County Traffic Court
Traffic Court - Denver, Colorado |
Denver City & County Criminal Court
Criminal Court - Denver, Colorado |
Canon City Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Canon City,
Colorado |
Castle Rock Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Castle
Rock, Colorado |
Aurora Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Aurora, Colorado |
Brighton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Brighton, Colorado |
Cripple Creek Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Cripple
Creek,
Colorado |
Florence Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Florence, Colorado |
Broomfield Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Broomfield, Colorado |
Centennial Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Centennial, Colorado |
Fountain Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Fountain,
Colorado |
Manitou Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Manitou
Springs, Colorado |
Englewood Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Englewood, Colorado |
Federal Heights Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Federal Heights, Colorado |
Monument Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Monument, Colorado |
Palmer Lake Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Palmer
Lake, Colorado |
Golden Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Golden, Colorado |
Littleton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Littleton,
Colorado |
Pueblo Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Pueblo,
Colorado |
Simla Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Simla,
Colorado |
Sheridan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Sheridan,
Colorado |
Thornton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Thornton, Colorado |
Woodland Park Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Woodland
Park,
Colorado
|
|
|
Wheat Ridge Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Wheat Ridge,
Colorado
|
|
|

CRS 42-4-1102. Altering of speed
limits - required basis of a traffic investigation or survey or upon the basis of appropriate design standards and projected traffic volumes.
Refer to above link for information.

Regulatory and advisory roadway signage must
conform state law and to a manual - standardized with respect to size, color and
placement. Refer to above link for information.

In general terms, velocity and speed mean the same thing: the distance moved
in a unit of time.
Velocity is ordinarily expressed in
feet per second.
Speed is more commonly used with
reference to motor vehicles, is measured in miles and hours and speedometers are
made to read in miles per hour.
-
In speeding or stop-sign / stoplight cases, sometimes seconds (or
fractions of a second) become relevant to the officer’s opportunity to
observe or calculation error.
-
This is particularly true in cross-examining an officer who conducted a
vascar clock or pace clock in a speeding case, or can be devastating to the
officer’s credibility in cross-examination of a stop sign / red light
observation.
-
Accident investigation reports commonly express velocity (feet per
second). Conversion is necessary to understand the accident report or review
the credibility of the accident investigation.
-
Therefore, one must be able to convert miles per hour into feet per
second.
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
CONVERSION
Speed to Velocity
Miles Per Hour To Feet Per Second
Miles per hour can be changed to feet per second by multiplying the number of
miles per hour by the feet in a mile (5,280) and dividing by the seconds in an
hour (3,600). This is approximately equivalent to multiplying miles per hour by
1.47 (which is 5,280 / 3,600 to two decimal places).
Mathematical Formula
v = 1.47s
v = velocity (feet per second)
s - speed (miles per hour)
|
Example
|
60mph = 5,280 / 3,600 = 88 ft
per sec exactly or
|
|
|
60mph = 60 x 1.47 = 88.2 feet
per second approximately
|
Rough estimates: miles per hour can be multiplied by 1.5
Put another way, half the number is added to the number
|
Example
|
60mph = 60 x 1.5 = 90 ft per
see, approximately or
|
|
|
60 mph plus 30 mph (half that
amount) = 90 ft per sec, approximately
|
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
CONVERSION
Velocity to Speed
Feet Per Second
To Miles Per Hour
Feet per second can be changed to miles per hour by multiplying by the
seconds in an hour (3,600) and dividing by the feet in a mile (5,280). This is
approximately equivalent to dividing by 1.47 or multiplying by 0.682 (3,600 /
5,280 to three decimal places)
Mathematical Formula
s = v / 1.47 or s = 0.682v
v = velocity (feet per second)
s - speed (miles per hour)
|
Example
|
66 ft per sec = 66 x 3,600 /
5,280 = 45 mph exactly or
|
|
|
66 feet per second = 66 x 0.682
= 45.0 mph approximately
|
Rough estimates: miles per hour is two thirds of feet per second
|
Example
|
two thirds of 66 feet per second
is 44 miles per hour approximately or
|
|
|
66 feet per second = 66 x 2 =
132 / 3 = 44.0 mph approximately
|
|
|
66 feet per second = 66 x 0.682
= 45.0 mph approximately
|
Multiplying by 2/3 (0.6667) is roughly the same as dividing by 1.5
|
Example
|
66 feet per second = 66 / 1.5
44.0 mph approximately
|

MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
REQUIREMENT OF EVIDENCE
|
A judge or magistrate may not let the issue go to a jury (lack of prima facie
evidence) unless there is mechanical support (radar, vascar, pace clock or
laser) for the visual estimate. In a trial to the court, I've seen a judge
stop the case when the officer admitted the ticket was based only upon a visual
estimate. Other judges may proceed.

MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
VISUAL ESTIMATE
|
As a part of radar or vascar training, officers must make visual estimates of
speed. To become certified and receive a wallet certification card, each
must accurately estimate speeds:
"On the
sit" 10 estimates plus or minus 3 miles per hour
"On the move" 5
estimates plus or minus 5 miles per hour
To quote the TV credit card commercial: "What's in your wallet?"
Hopefully, the officer doesn't
possess the certification card and it's not "To the neighbors!"


MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
RADAR
|
State patrol troopers, city police and county deputy sheriff's typically have
access to radar devices.
DEFINITIONS AS APPLIED TO RADAR
TERMINOLOGY
testing officer's radar knowledge
-
Batching: Effect caused by rapid acceleration
or deceleration of
patrol vehicle while obtaining a clock using moving radar. Patrol speed
calculation is not accurate, causing faulty target reading.
-
Target Bumping: Same as batching.
-
Multiple Bounce: Radar beam is bounced off a radar reflective object.
Several various effects mat be noted, depending upon circumstances.
a. Patrol speed is doubled and
presented in target window. No reading in patrol window (moving radar).
b. Radar beam bounces off a
building, sign, etc., to clock a target approaching from the rear instead of
to the front. (moving or stationary. Not too frequent in moving mode, but
possible.)
c. Radar Beam bounces off
reflective surfaces to clock a target over a hillcrest or around a curve in
a canyon. The clock may be quite accurate, but is invalid due to no tracking
history.
-
Own Speed Capture: (Moving mode only) Patrol and target speed identical
in the absence of a target vehicle.
-
Shadowing: Effect noted when patrol speed is referenced from a moving
object. Patrol window shows opening or closing speed between moving object and
adds the difference between false and true patrol speed onto target's speed.
-
Panning or Scanning: As defined by Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, both
imply movement. As applied to CLETA Radar Instruction, either term describes
moving the radar antenna to follow a target, "Quick-Draw" movement,
etc.
-
Feedback Effect: Caused by aiming radar antenna at or across readout
portion of control module. May result in high readings or unusual audio or both.
(D.O.T. calls this panning)
-
Cosine Factor: Effect noted when an angle exists between the radar and a
target. Effect on target speed varies according to circumstances.
a. Stationary Radar - Always favors target vehicle. Displayed speed is
less than true speed.
b. Moving Radar - If no cosine angle exists on patrol speed, any cosine
effect favors the target vehicle.
c. Moving Radar - If a cosine angle is present on patrol speed, the error
in patrol speed is added to the target vehicle's speed.
-
Interference: Accidental introduction of a false signal into a radar may
be natural or man made in origin.
-
Jamming: Deliberate introduction of a signal to cause a false radar
reading or to prevent any reading at all from being displayed.
-
Low Speed Combining: (Moving Radar Only) Effect noted when radar
combines patrol and target speed and gives the speed in the patrol window. No
target reading is present. Usually happens at or below low end of moving radar
operating limit. (Older officers trained by manufacturer may refer to this as
Low Speed Batching.)
-
Cosine Factor - Angle Error
Error is linked to angle.
v = Actual velocity
va = Apparent velocity (what radar sees)
va = v (cos 0)
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
CERTIFICATION
* CALIBRATION * SET UP
radar speed
enforcement
-
Preferable to voir dire officer prior to introduction of
speed reading
Alternative: cross examination
-
Accuracy of unit
Manufacture's certificate of
accuracy
Prosecutors will likely
attempt to introduce
Manufacturer is likely
not a governmental agency, therefore not a government document under
seal.
Certificate is subject
to the hearsay objection.
Tuning fork(s)
One tuning fork
certified by the Colorado Dept. of Agriculture, Div. of Weights
& Measures
certification date
within one year prior to the stop People v. Walker, 610
P.2d 496 (Colo.1980)
certification date
within one year before or after the stop People v.
McIntyre, 719
P.2d 727, 729 (Colo.1986)
Two tuning forks of
different speed calibrations - neither one certified
By running a vehicle with a
calibrated speedometer through radar
By concurrent speed check of
a vehicle by radar and by vascar
Timing of accuracy
check
Reasonable time before
and after operation to insure proper functioning. People v.
Walker, 610 P.2d 496, 498 (Colo.1980); People v. McIntyre,
719
P.2d 727, 729 (Colo.1986)
At place where defendant
was arrested and immediately prior thereto. City of St.
Louis v. Boecker, 370 S.W.2d 731 (Mo App. 1963), Royals v.
Commonwealth, 198 VA 876, 96 S.E. 2d 812(Ct. App. 1957)
At and near the time of
the stop.
Due to impracticality of
using a second calibrated speedometer or separate vascar unit on
location, accuracy is usually verified by tuning fork(s).
-
Law enforcement agency FCC
license.
Can be discovered
Dates of issuance and expiration
If not current, the unit is
being operated unlawfully.
FCC license generally runs
on a 2 or 5 year cycle.
-
Maintenance and recalibration
Exact nature of repair.
Dates of repair
Dates of recalibration -
preferably within 6 months
Identity and qualification
of technician
Hearsay objection
-
Radar unit frequency
Pulse radar (similar to
military - can track multiple targets) - I've not seen in Colorado
Doppler radar - S Band, X
Band, K Band
S Band no longer used in
Colorado
X Band 10,525 MHz
K Band 24,150 MHz
-
Tuning forks
Stamped on fork(s):
speed corresponding to fork
Serial Number
Manufacturer
Frequency: X or K Band
Frequency correspond to unit
- X Band or K Band
Speed correspond to fork
Serial number &
manufacturer
Tines
damage, dents or dings -
Walker, supra at 499
Position relative to unit
Distance from radar
antenna 1" - 2"
Horizontal or vertical
placement - harmonics
| Tine Direction
Placement
|
|
|
|
| Improper
harmonics
|
{__}
|
Proper harmonics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation
Striking metal object -
improper harmonics
Striking too hard
results in next harmonic and higher speed
May damage or dent tines
Two forks simultaneously
- 80 & 50 = 30
Antenna direction and
possible other targets during accuracy test.
Readings on accuracy
test
Each fork
Patrol window and
target window
Steady, flashing, no
reading, fluctuating
Verification of subtracters in moving radar
2 forks simultaneously; i.e.: 80 and 50 = 30
Time of accuracy test(s)
Reasonable time before & after operation to ensure functioning
properly
Walker, supra at 498
At place where defendant arrested and immediately prior to
City of St. Louis v. Boecker, 370 S.W. 2d 731 (Mo. App.
1963)
Royals v. Commonwealth, 198 VA. 876, 96 S.E.2d 812 (Ct.
App. ___)
Operation of accuracy test
Antenna direction and other possible targets during accuracy test
Readings on accuracy test
Each fork; patrol window and target window
Steady, flashing, no reading, fluctuating
Interference
Heater fan
Power source
Direct to car battery,
cigarette lighter, portable battery pack
Shielded cable from power source to battery
If none - engine and electrical interference
Multiple cables twisted - antenna, power and remote
Induction coil effect
Increase in speed reading
Damage
Antenna - effect signal received
Cords - exposed wires
Inspection date of arrest?
(suck in antenna or diodes and amplify)
Location:
Microwave transmitters Radio, CB, Amateur base stations
e.g. KBPI ROCKS THE ROCKIES
Power lines - high voltage
Hospital, Doctor, Chiropractor, Dentist: X-Ray
Service Station, banks, business:
Neon or Fluorescent Light
Generators
ARC Welding Equipment
Routine procedure on/off plug in radar device
Self
Other officers
Procedure utilized by officer on/off when plug in radar device on date
of arrest
Round off vs. lop off by device; i.e.: 49.4 or 49.6 mph
Speed reported 49 or 50 mph
Sufficiency of evidence
Calibration by running another unit through zone of influence
Hearsay objection unless other officer present and testifies
Calibration of squad car speedometer
Tachometer and mechanic testimony required + maintenance records
Stop watch: WWV Bureau check (National Bureau - Boulder)
Radar device; same unit bootstrapping or another radar device
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
OPERATION AND USE
radar speed enforcement
-
Preferable to voir dire officer prior to
introduction of speed reading
Alternative: cross examination
-
Visual estimate of speed of Defendant's vehicle
Reinforce lack of certification re visual estimation
Distance of Defendant's vehicle at estimation of speed
Length of time of observation prior to speed estimation
Obstructions to vision
Time of day of citation
Light or dark
-
Weather date of stop
Rain, sleet, snow, blowing dirt/sand/debris
-
Number of vehicles in each lane and each direction of travel
-
Describe defendant's vehicle
-
Describe other vehicles in proximity to Defendant's vehicle
-
Audio (Speedgun 8, K-55, MR-7, MR99, HR-8, K-911)
On/Off
Volume
Doppler signal strength
Detection of interference or other vehicles
Describe sound
TV or Radio test pattern
pitch vary with speed of target
volume vary with speed of target
-
Round off vs. lop off by device;
i.e.: 49.4 or 49.6
Speed unknown; insufficient evidence
-
Identification of terms and effect on radar device:
Ghosting: weak signal or multiple bounce
Shadowing: beam bounce off reflective object (trunk) add patrol to D.
Low speed Combining: combine target & patrol in patrol window.
Multiple Bounce: i.e.. buildings in town
Panning: move stationary unit increase speed reading (stationary).
Batching: rapid acceleration/deceleration of radar car (moving mode).
radar device unable to interpret
Cosine Error: angle of antenna to target (stationary unit or mode).
45 Degree: 100 mph = 70 mph
30 Degree: 100 mph = 86 mph Aim 500'_750" = 5 Degree
20 Degree: 100 mph = 93 mph Lift.
10 Degree: 100 mph = 98 mph
Scanning: move stationary unit increase speed reading
arc = 2_3 mph "Quick Draw"
push =10 mph
Same as panning
Target Bumping
Same as batching
Feedback Effect: aim antenna at or across readout
window ==> high reading.
Interference: accidental false signal
Jamming: deliberate introduction of false signal
Own Speed Capture: Moving mode; own speed in patrol &
target window.
Beam shape
Wedge from antenna - angle?
NO: CIGAR SHAPE
How identify target if unaware of beam shape and targets in zone
Log of checks personal diary or journal
Target distance
-
Accuracy
Maximum distance with accuracy
Minimum distance with accuracy
-
Interference
Heater fan: false reading or shorten beam range
Power source: direct to car battery, cigarette lighter, portable
battery pack.
Cigarette lighter = engine & all electrical interference
Ignition alternator AC alternating current interference
Shielded cable from power source to battery: hearsay
engine & electrical interference *Panel instruments in in
patrol car.
Multiple cables twisted; antenna, power and remote control
Induction coil effect=increase speed reading
Damage to antenna: effect signal received
Damage to cords; exposed wires Inspection date of arrest
suck in antenna or diodes and amplify
-
Location:
Microwave transmitters; radio, CB, Amateur base stations,
e.g.
KBPI
ROCKS THE ROCKIES
High voltage power lines: how does officer check effect
Hospital, doctor, dentist, chiropractors: X-ray
Service station, banks, business: Neon Fluorescent Light
Generators
Arc welding equipment
Effect of weather
Wind, rain, snow, blowing sand or debris
Buildings or reflective signs or burglar alarms
Around curve: bounce off power lines
Behind: bounce mirror
Area and traffic: size area and amount of traffic
position, mass, speed of other
Moving or stationary mode
Automatic lock: first speed exceed threshold entered
failure to release: improper speed for defendant.
Lock, automatic or manual
failure to release prior target reading - no relationship to defendant
inadvertent error (naturally)
"Out in front and nearest radar"
Target not always lead car: speed, position & mass
Experience at location
Number of times set up at specific location
Moving mode
Comparison patrol window to speedometer
Calibration of patrol car speedometer
hearsay unless mechanic
testifies
Repair of vehicle transmission or radar device
re-certification - Hearsay
Beam absorption - inaccurate patrol window reading (reduced)
Loose gravel, sand, tall grass
Moving grass, trees or "stationary objects" increase patrol
window.
IF UNAWARE OF LIMITATIONS OF RADAR, HOW DO YOU COMPENSATE?
Reason enforce prima facie speed
Conditions which rendered defendant's speed unreasonable & imprudent
or dangerous
Have Officer SPECIFY EXACT CONDITIONS - probably can't


MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
VASCAR
|
I have defended vascar tickets against the Colorado State Patrol, but have not
seen vascar usage by any city police or county deputy sheriff's.
Have you ever seen those broad white lines painted on the shoulder of the road
running perpendicular to the lane of travel? Ever wonder what they
are? Hello vascar.
Vascar usage:
-
Typical - set up at a freeway
on-ramp or bridge
White marker lines are
easily visible to the officer
Freeway entrance ramps give
easy access to the target vehicle
Periodically chase
motorcycles may be placed further down the road
-
Moving mode while the trooper is
traveling
Cruiser can be traveling the
same or opposite direction as the target vehicle
-
Ever seen those signs
"Speed Monitored by Aircraft?" Hello vascar
Typically there is a chase
cruiser somewhere nearby
Vascar measures time and distance - the very definition of speed - tough to
defend this case. Here,
conversion
- speed to velocity, feet and
fractions of a second regarding entry / exit from the measured distance are
critical in cross-examination to attack the officer's / deputy's / trooper's
credibility and the actual measurement evidence of defendant's speed.
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
Examination: Trooper "on the
sit"
-
Training and experience with
unit
-
Training, experience and
certification re visual speed estimates
Can trooper produce a wallet
certification card?
-
Markers
Initial marker measurement
Whether the trooper was
physically present
Whether the tape measure or
rolling tape was certified by the Colorado Dept. of Highways
Actual markers imbedded at
the time of measurement
Whether the trooper was
physically present when the markers were painted
Whether the paint markers
were properly placed upon the imbedded markers
Condition of paint -
visibility
Weather and road conditions
- visibility
-
Trooper's location and
opportunity to observe
Interference or distraction
by other traffic or obstructions
Preferable to view scene
-
Location of defendant's vehicle
as it entered measured zone
Vascar activation at front
bumper
Vascar activation at rear
bumper
Vascar activation by use of
vehicle shadows
Shadow produces more
accurate measure than use of vehicle body part
-
Location of defendant's vehicle
as it exited measured zone
Vascar activation at front
bumper
Vascar activation at rear
bumper
Vascar activation by use of
vehicle shadows
-
Trooper's reflexes
Actual time available to
activate depending upon alleged speed
Velocity computation to
obtain fraction of a second
-
Using velocity
computation,
elicit admissions as to effect of reflect error or visual error
-
Calibration, maintenance and
repair of vascar unit
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
Examination: Trooper "on the
move"
-
Training and experience with
unit
-
Very similar to above, except
-
Calibration of patrol vehicle
speedometer
see
hearsay objections and
mechanic's testimony in radar above
-
Stationary objects chosen as
"measured distance" for vascar distance computation
-
Shadow becomes more critical as
distances are usually short
-
Shortened distance increases
speed error based upon reflex shortcoming or visual error

MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
PACE
CLOCK
|
Pace clock is fairly common. The best defense is disqualification of
testimony based upon cruiser speedometer lack of certification or failure of
prosecutors to provide discovery prior to trial.
Examination
-
Cruiser speedometer calibration
Qualified mechanic using a
tachometer - insufficient foundation
Hearsay
objection unless
mechanic testifies and produces maintenance records
Officer may attempt to
testify cruiser was run through vascar or radar
Hearsay
objection unless
other officer present to testify
Officer's radar or
vascar qualifications, tuning fork(s), monitored speed
See radar and vascar
defenses - hearsay objections
Multiple levels of
hearsay regarding actual accuracy of measuring unit
Discovery objections if
documents were not produced prior to trial
Unless certified accurate,
the officer's testimony may likely be excluded
-
Reasonable distance neither
gained nor lost distance between cruiser and defendant
Object to reasonableness of
distance - insufficient to establish reliable clock
Officer's judgment re
neither gained nor lost distance between vehicles
Examine on other traffic,
hazards or distractions
Examine on number of persons
in vehicle during transit vs. when stopped
Lack of attention to
detail or observation

MEASUREMENT
OF SPEED
LASER
|
To
my knowledge, no Colorado appellate case law has entered regarding admissibility of laser
evidence, however Colorado Springs Municipal Court has addressed the subject in
City v. Gutierrez, 03 M 51426 (en banc Nov. 7, 2003). The court took
judicial notice of the scientific principles as applied to the LIDAR LTI 20-20
speed detection device. The court found the unit must be reliably
calibrated within a reasonable time both before and after its operation to
insure that it is functioning properly, and that this foundation may be laid
through 1) the display test, 2) the self test, 3) the scope alignment test and
4) the calibration verification test, accomplished either by the fixed test or
the delta distance test. The court ruled that it was satisfied beyond a
reasonable doubt in the
Gutierrez
case that the LTI 20-20, when tested
according the manufacturer's specifications and when used by a properly trained
operator, is an effective, accurate and reliable method of ascertaining the
speed of moving vehicles.
Appellate case law regarding laser
unit evidence admissibility varies from one state to another.
I have not had a Colorado laser ticket proceed to trial and have not
researched the operational aspects of laser units. Lasers units can return a picture of the vehicle, including license plate and driver. Issue
may exist regarding external calibration or testing. If laser arises in a
case for which I have been retained, I would research operational aspects of the
unit, including but not limited to manufacturer specifications.


|
|
|
|
|
LOSS OF COLORADO
DRIVING PRIVILEGES |
|
|
|
Driving in Colorado is
a constitutionally protected privilege, but nevertheless a privilege
which may be lost. Multiple statutes can cause loss of driving
privileges for different driver behavior. Drivers are entitled
to a
DMV hearing. In some circumstances the right to hearing
precedes potential DMV adverse action; under other Colorado traffic
laws the adverse order is entered, then the driver is provided notice
of the adverse action and right to request subsequent hearing.
If hearing has been held or a DMV final order has otherwise
entered and the Colorado driver's license or Colorado driving privileges have
been suspended, revoked or denied, the driver's remaining recourse is appeal to
the District
Court.
DMV appeal is subject to a
statute of limitations. Right to
appeal may be lost if the driver delays. Upon final order in the District
Court, either party make take the case on appeal to the
Colorado Court of
Appeals. Refer to links for additional information. |
|

|
ATTORNEY
REPRESENTATION
AND DECLINED MATTERS
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
ALTERNATIVES
|
FIND
A LAWYER |
if
you are seeking the below
please refer to above links for helpful information |
|
sole practitioner
attorney does not accept these matters |
|
|
| |
a. a pro-bono (free) lawyer
b. an attorney who may take
lower fees - economic hardship
c. an attorney who may take installment payments |
|
|
|
| |
|
MID-LITIGATION
REPRESENTATION
alternatives and find a
lawyer links provided as a courtesy
|
|
Attorney
Policies
Litigant Pro Se - Attempt to
Prepare Defense of Own Traffic or Criminal Case |
|
1.
Adequate Time. If sufficient time exists to adequately prepare your case and if prospective client approves this
attorney's fees and costs structure, attorney will
likely accept defense representation. This shall
not constitute an offer of representation; attorney and
prospective client retain discretion through
first
consultation. |
|
2.
Insufficient Time. If you've waited until the eleventh hour and there is not
sufficient time to adequately prepare your case or defense before a contested
court proceeding, please do not call. I decline. |
|
|
|
3.
Limited Assistance.
Please do not call requesting instruction, directions, legal theory,
forms completion or limited document drafting, partial representation, or an explanation of
applicable law to assist you in preparation or defense of your own case. I decline. |
|
|
|
|
Attorney
Policies
Representation
by Previous Attorney
|
|
1.
Current Attorney.
Until an order has entered withdrawing representation by an
attorney, an ethical rule violation exists if counsel
knowingly speaks to another attorney's client without current
attorney's consent. This ethical rule governs all
attorneys. Please do not call until after
you have terminated representation by a former attorney.
After
other counsel's withdrawal it may take significant effort for the the new attorney to "catch up."
Please be aware fees and costs will be associated with procuring the court
file and coming up to speed in the case. |
|
2.
Adequate Time.
If prospective client terminates employment of the
former attorney, if sufficient time exists to adequately prepare your
traffic or criminal case, and if prospective client approves this
attorney's fees and costs structure, attorney will
likely accept representation. This shall
not constitute an offer of representation; attorney and
prospective client retain discretion through
first
consultation. |
|
3.
Insufficient Time.
If you've waited until the eleventh hour and there is
not sufficient time to adequately prepare your case or
defense before a contested court proceeding, please do
not call. I decline. |
|
|
|
4.
Second Opinion.
I will not arm chair quarterback another
attorney's case preparation, trial tactics or theory of
the case. Please do not call for a second
opinion or an opinion regarding the competence
of preparation or defense in your current
traffic or criminal case. I decline. |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
POST
SENTENCING MATTERS
PROBATION
REVOCATION * PAROLE VIOLATION
DEFERRED SENTENCE
REVOCATION * APPEALS |
|
Post
Sentencing. I do not accept post sentencing
matters in any criminal, DUI or traffic case unless I provided
representation during the case in chief at the trial court level
and am familiar with the facts,
testimony and exhibits received into evidence, meritorious issues
& rulings. That's been my policy for years. Please do
not call or inquire regarding post sentencing matters if you are
not a former client.
|
|
|
|
This
includes plea to
domestic
violence or other
criminal charge,
DUI,
DEAC
or DWAI charge or other
traffic
charge and probation,
deferred sentence,
parole or incarceration or
revocation proceedings based upon alleged failure to comply. |
| |
|
Exceptions.
If the underlying criminal case qualifies, refer to
sealing
criminal records. I accept meritorious sealing cases
regardless of whether or not you are a former client. NOTICE:
alcohol related traffic offenses, other traffic offenses or traffic
infractions are a specifically excluded in the
sealing
statute and can not be sealed. If relevant, I also accept
meritorious
collateral
attack cases.
|
| |
|
|
|
ATTORNEY
TRADE AREA & TRAVEL
CASES OUTSIDE EL PASO COUNTY
GEOGRAPHIC
DISTANCE
ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS |
Colorado is a big
state
ease of internet access, email & toll free phone doesn't change
that fact |
|
I welcome new cases. Intent is not to be harsh
or to discard potential new business, but to be practical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney
is very willing to travel outside the Colorado Springs area to present
or defend a case,
but please be aware travel time, mileage and expense would apply. If you are out of state or unfamiliar with Colorado
geography, refer to the map to determine where
Colorado Springs is
located in relation to the county of your court case or hearing. |
|
|
|
|
|
If
travel is necessary, a
trust deposit would be required to
cover anticipated travel time, mileage & expenses.
If it is not economically justifiable to retain my services with travel,
please contact counsel in the locale of your case. |
|
|
|
COUNTIES |
CITIES / TOWNS
|
COURTS |
|
| Colorado
Springs, Colorado |
Fountain,
Colorado |
| Manitou
Springs, Colorado |
Calhan,
Colorado |
| Monument,
Colorado |
Palmer
Lake, Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
| Brighton,
Colorado |
Thornton,
Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Littleton,
Colorado |
Centennial,
Colorado |
| Aurora,
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kiowa,
Colorado |
Simla,
Colorado
|
|
|
|
| Canon City,
Colorado |
Florence,
Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Golden,
Colorado |
Wheat Ridge
, Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cripple
Creek, Colorado |
Woodland
Park, Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATE COURTS.
Please review
traffic infractions vs
traffic offenses.
Unless a speeding ticket is 25+ mph over the limit in state
court, it is not a criminal offense, no prosecutor is
involved, plea negotiations are not available and legal
counsel's only recourse to achieve relief is trial on the
merits to a magistrate. |
|
Plea negotiations are
available in most Municipal Courts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|


| please
feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation |
|
|
|
FREE
INITIAL CONSULTATION
not an offer for free legal
advice - refer to link for terms
I am a sole practitioner with need to manage my caseload & reserve
the right to decline any legal matter |


|
Colorado Springs, Colorado, speeding ticket, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, defense, municipal ordinances, law, reasonable and prudent speed, radar, vascar, laser, pace clock, speed, velocity, speed limits, preemption, traffic engineer, survey,
speeding tickets, Colorado state courts,
traffic ticket, defenses, discovery, information, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Colorado, court, lawyer,
attorney, Manitou Springs Municipal
Court, Woodland Park Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court,
Fountain Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Pueblo Municipal Court,
Castle Rock Municipal Court, Monument
Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Municipal Court
Colorado Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Manitou Springs Colorado,
Municipal Court Woodland Park Colorado, Municipal Court Cripple Creek
Colorado, Municipal Court Fountain Colorado,
Municipal Court Calhan Colorado, Court Calhan Colorado, Municipal Court Simla Colorado, Town of Simla Colorado,
Court Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Pueblo Colorado,
Municipal Court Castle Rock Colorado, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado,
Municipal Court Monument Colorado, Municipal Court Palmer Lake Colorado,
Municipal Court Denver Colorado, Municipal Court Aurora Colorado,
Municipal Court Brighton Colorado, Municipal Court Broomfield Colorado,
Municipal Court Centennial Colorado, Municipal Court Englewood Colorado,
Municipal Court Federal Heights Colorado, Municipal Court Golden Colorado,
Municipal Court Littleton Colorado, Municipal Court Sheridan Colorado,
Municipal Court Thornton Colorado, Municipal Court Wheat Ridge Colorado,
Municipal Court WheatRidge Colorado
|
|
|
Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip
Codes |
|
|
| 80918 80920 80919 80917 80915
80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 |
|
80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912
80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 |
|
80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945
80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997 |

Copyright © 1983
- All Rights Reserved - Document
Revised: October 01, 2009
no copyright claimed to merchant logo, software logo, flag, envelope or drawing images
|