Collateral Attack
Home Up

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado    El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson  *  Attorney at Law  *  Colorado Springs
COLORADO SPRINGS COLLATERAL ATTACK -- CRIMINAL & TRAFFIC

Email Attorney 

Attorney Vita

Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003  **  Toll Free (800) 410-1002
Hours Consultation Terms

Fees & Costs

Retainer Documents Driving Directions Maps to Attorney Travel * Trade Area * Courts

 

COLORADO SPRINGS COLLATERAL ATTACK
ATTACK UPON COLORADO GUILTY PLEA OR COLORADO CRIMINAL CONVICTION
COLLATERAL ATTACK - TRAFFIC & CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS

ATTORNEY HOMEPAGE

motion to set aside prior guilty plea or conviction - felony * misdemeanor * petty offenses * DUI & traffic offenses
Attorney Trial Practice 29+ years Colorado State Courts, Colorado Springs Municipal Court & Colorado DMV License Hearings & Appeals

General Information
What is a Collateral Attack?
Statutes of Limitations
Time Limitations on Collateral Attacks
Standards * Threshold * Burden Proof
Criminal * Misdemeanor * Traffic
Collateral Attack
underlying court
Collateral Attack
pending prosecution
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS Do I Need an Attorney? Sealing Criminal Records
 
Bail Bond Public Service Remedial Links Completion Forms

 ATTORNEY POLICIES
  Cases Outside Colorado Springs - Travel
 No Pro Bono Assistance  *  No Installment Payment
 Legal Advice Limited to Clients - Not General Public
 Representation Now - Another Attorney or Self
 Attorney Representation & Declined Matters
 No Post Sentencing - Revocation or Appeal * Sealing Records
 

attorney does not accept criminal & traffic cases after sentencing unless he defended the underlying case
non-acceptance includes probation revocation, deferred sentence revocation, parole violation or appeal  **  eligible sealing and collateral attack cases accepted
 

Colorado, collateral attack, motion to set aside, prior, guilty plea, plea, conviction, underlying conviction, felony, misdemeanor, petty offenses, DUI, traffic offenses, threshold, burden of proof, improper advisement, statute of limitations, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, court

Adobe Acrobat Reader version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files    Free Download

BASIC INFORMATION
please refer to the below links for basic information regarding defense of criminal & traffic cases

Right to Silence Search & Seizure Defendant Demeanor Bail Bond Independent Service Providers Advice from Laymen

        There are two types of collateral attacks.

        1.  The first type of collateral attack involves a defendant is charged with a crime or has a DMV adverse action pending.  One of the elements in the pending case involves prior conviction(s).
                a.  In the pending criminal charge, the defendant moves to suppress evidence of the prior conviction(s) or moves to dismiss the current charge on the basis the prior conviction(s) was / were improperly entered, or the DMV lacked jurisdiction to enter the DMV adverse action order.  The most common example would be a defendant charged with felony or misdemeanor driving under restraint who claims in the pending criminal case that the DMV adverse action order which took away driving privileges was entered improperly upon infirm prior convictions or that the DMV lacked jurisdiction.  If the DMV adverse action order is void and unlawful, pending driving under restraint criminal charges must be dismissed.
                b.  In the DMV adverse action hearing, the driver alleges the prior "conviction(s)" or points may not be used as a basis for taking away driving privileges on the basis the "conviction(s)" was / were improperly entered.  This could be litigated in the DMV adverse action hearing, or the driver may request a continuance and file a collateral attack in the underlying traffic court case(s).  Litigation at DMV adverse action hearing is the safe course - if continuance is requested and denied, insufficient evidence would be in the record for appeal.

        2.  In the second type of collateral attack, after final disposition in a traffic case defendant asks the court to set aside conviction on the basis it was improperly entered.

******************************   ******************************

        In either circumstance with a meritorious claim, the defendant is attempting to undo a previous wrong.  Collateral attack is a confusing area of law with which many prosecutors are not terribly familiar.  Sometimes, to better the client's position, defense simply throws it up against the wall to see if it sticks.  

        Collateral attack on a DMV adverse action order (suspension, revocation, denial, habitual offender status) would be justified only in two circumstances.

        Collateral attack could be maintained if the DMV adverse action order were void, rather than merely erroneous or voidable, because the department had lacked jurisdiction over the person or the subject matter. Estate of Bonfils v. Davis, 190 Colo. 70, 543 P.2d 701 (1976); McLeod v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, 186 Colo. 234, 526 P.2d 1318 (1974); Davidson Chevrolet v. City and County of Denver, 138 Colo. 171, 330 P.2d 1116 (1958).
        The driver would be entitled to collaterally attack the revocation order had it been based on "a conviction obtained in violation of his / her constitutional rights". People v. Heinz, 197 Colo. 102, ___, 589 P.2d 931, 933 (1979).

        When an administrative agency has jurisdiction over the person and subject matter in question, and when the agency is not proceeding contrary to the requirements of the state or federal constitution, the fact that the agency's order is erroneously or improvidently granted does not justify failure to obey the order. Where a driver does not challenge a DMV adverse action order against the driver's license until after arrest for driving under restraint, collateral attack on erroneous application of law to the facts will not be heard.  Drivers have the duty to comply with a DMV adverse action order until it is rescinded pursuant to a direct appeal rather than a collateral attack.  People v. Able, 200 Colo. 115, 618 P.2d 1110 (Colo. 1980)

        The driver may have had the below defenses available at DMV adverse action hearing, however they are merely erroneous application of the law to the facts.  Below DMV adverse action defenses are not based upon DMV lack of jurisdiction and do not rise to constitutional proportions.  Therefore the below defenses will not be considered by a court in a driving under restraint criminal case collateral attack.
 
******************************   ******************************

DMV has assessed points or conviction against wrong person

This may be a defense in a subsequent driving under restraint criminal charge as a collateral attack (DMV order void for lack of personal jurisdiction).  However that is questionable.  DMV has subject matter jurisdiction over license actions and personal jurisdiction is acquired when the notice of hearing is served.  There is no Colorado appellate caselaw on the issue of whether misidentification deprives the DMV of personal jurisdiction to proceed with adverse action.  If not argued at DMV hearing, use of an improper conviction may be considered a mere error in application of the law and denial of criminal case collateral attack.

******************************   ******************************

Points not identified on traffic infraction penalty assessment

Municipal court default judgment - defendant failure to appear - traffic infraction penalty assessment.

******************************   ******************************

Penalty assessment notice deficiency

This may be a defense in a subsequent driving under restraint criminal charge as a collateral attack - (inadequate notice reaches constitutional proportions)  However that is questionable - no Colorado cases have been decided whether PA notice deficiency may be used as a collateral attack in a subsequent driving under restraint criminal charge.  If not argued at DMV hearing, use of an improper conviction may be considered a mere error in application of the law and denial of criminal case collateral attack.

******************************   ******************************

Summary - if you snooze, you lose

        Driving under restraint criminal charges carry mandatory jail and some are felonies carrying penitentiary time.  If you have a license problem and your driver's license is important to you, it's a plan to consult an attorney as quickly as possible.

        Defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prior conviction was invalid.  Once such a showing has been made, the People have the burden to establish that the conviction was constitutionally obtained.  People v. Hampton, 619 P.2d 48 (Colo. 1980), People v. McKnight, 200 Colo. 486, 617 P.2d 1178 (Colo. 1980), People v. Heinz, 197 Colo. 102, 589 P.2d 931 (1979).

TRAFFIC DEFENSE & CRIMINAL DEFENSE
COLLATERAL ATTACK
 
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
 
TIME LIMITATIONS FOR COLLATERAL ATTACK
IN UNDERLYING CONVICTION COURT CASES

 
TRAFFIC * MISDEMEANOR * FELONY
 

Colorado Springs
MUNICIPAL COURT

 
DRIVING UNDER RESTRAINT

CRS 42-4-1702. Alcohol- or drug-related traffic offenses - collateral attack
        (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection (1), no person against whom a judgment has been entered for a violation of section 42-4-1301 (1) or (2) shall collaterally attack the validity of that judgment unless such attack is commenced within six months after the date of entry of the judgment.
        (2) In recognition of the difficulties attending the litigation of stale claims and the potential for frustrating various statutory provisions directed at repeat offenders, former offenders, and habitual offenders, the only exceptions to the time limitations specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) shall be:
                (a) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the alleged infraction;
                (b) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the person of the violator;
                (c) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was caused by an adjudication of incompetence or by commitment of the violator to an institution for treatment as a mentally ill person; or
(d) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was the result of circumstances amounting to justifiable excuse or excusable neglect.

CRS 42-4-1708. Traffic infractions - .... collateral attack. 
        (5)    (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection (5), no person against whom a judgment has been entered for a traffic infraction as defined in section 42-4-1701 (3) (a) shall collaterally attack the validity of that judgment unless such attack is commenced within six months after the date of entry of the judgment.
                (b) In recognition of the difficulties attending the litigation of stale claims and the potential for frustrating various statutory provisions directed at repeat offenders, former offenders, and habitual offenders, the only exceptions to the time limitations specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection (5) shall be:
                        (I) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the alleged infraction;
                        (II) A case in which the court entering judgment did not have jurisdiction over the person of the violator;
                        (III) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was caused by an adjudication of incompetence or by commitment of the violator to an institution for treatment as a mentally ill person; or
                        (IV) Where the court hearing the collateral attack finds that the failure to seek relief within the applicable time period was the result of circumstances amounting to justifiable excuse or excusable neglect.

MISDEMEANOR AND TRAFFIC OFFENSES

        State Court - County Court.  Regarding traffic offenses and misdemeanor cases where defendant entered a plea before a judge, the collateral attack is brought in County Court in the county in which the case was held.  Upon filing the collateral attack, the file is ordered from archived records and a transcript of all proceedings would also be ordered upon defendant's motion.   Upon receipt of the file and transcript, hearing is held.  The standards and limitations are set forth above.

******************************   ******************************

TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS
Minor Traffic Violations - Usually Remitted (Paid) by Mail

        State Court - County Court.  Regarding PA Notices where the driver remitted payment by mail to DMV Denver, the collateral attack is brought in County Court in the county in which the ticket was written.  Upon filing the collateral attack, the file is ordered sent from DMV Denver to the local court.  Upon receipt of the file, hearing is held.  The standards and limitations are set forth above.

        Municipal Court.  Regarding PA notice where the driver remitted payment by mail to the local municipal court or paid at a traffic violations bureau (clerk of court), the collateral attack is brought in Municipal Court in the town or city in which the ticket was written.  Upon filing the collateral attack, the file is ordered from archived records.  Upon receipt of the file, hearing is held.  The standards and limitations are set forth above.

******************************   ******************************

PRACTICALITIES

        Regarding misdemeanor and traffic offenses, judges are usually very careful with the C.R.Crim.P. 11 providency hearing - advisements before acceptance of plea.  Generally, an improper advisement can not be anticipated.  That doesn't mean a prosecutor wouldn't deal a disposition in advance of hearing.

        If brought more than 6 months after the plea / payment, I tell prospective clients the collateral attack could be shut down by the prosecution, however if it is important, try anyway.  The local district attorney's office has been cooperative, but that could change if a given DDA were familiar with collateral attack law.  I have not had occasion to bring collateral attack in Municipal Court in years, and therefore can offer no indication regarding cooperation.

        Collateral attack would be a defense normally considered by counsel in a misdemeanor or felony driving under restraint charge.  Counsel conducts factual interviews with the client and would inquire regarding the circumstances surrounding each underlying "conviction."  On-Line Colorado Driving Records are now available instantaneously allowing an overview of the driving history leading to DMV adverse action.  It may be necessary to search or order court file records or transcripts of court proceedings, but the facts can be ascertained.  If relevant, collateral attack should be utilized.

INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service * laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine

ADVICE BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals & street corner lawyers

COLLATERAL ATTACK
DO I NEED AN ATTORNEY?

 

Do I need an attorney?

Probably time to loosen the pocket book and hire a defense attorney.

If you are contemplating a collateral attack, more likely than not you are in way over your head and need defense counsel.  You may retain my services or the services of another attorney, but hire counsel.

 

ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
COLLATERAL ATTACK

 

        At the time of the first visit, a prospective client will be quoted attorney's fees and estimated costs. The quote will be honored for a period of seven (7) days, after which it is subject to change without notice if this office has not been retained.  Attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload.  Pending proposed client acceptance and payment, retainer agreement proposals are subject to withdrawal.  Attorney reserves the right to decline any case.
 
        In most circumstances, attorney initially makes an option offer of 1.) billing to be upon hourly fees, or in the alternative, 2.) quote of a flat fee through trial court final hearing on collateral attack. 
ELECTION. Offered fee options will be up to the client, however client's initial election will be final.
 
        Included in attorney's primary website is a web page devoted to clear definition & understanding of free
first consultation, fees and costs, retainer agreement and terms of representation.  Additional information regarding fees & costs may be found via the links following potential quotes.

POTENTIAL FEE QUOTE
COLLATERAL ATTACK
HEARING FLAT FEE $750

I generally offer hourly fees or a hearing flat fee.  The hearing flat fee would be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the case, however the above would be a common quote in a collateral attack.  This shall neither constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate.

 

I generally offer hourly fees or a hearing flat fee.  The hearing flat fee would be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the case, however the above would be a common quote in a collateral attack.  This shall neither constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate.

In the event collateral attack is successful and the plea is set aside, the case would be restored to initial status before conviction or entry of deferred sentence.  Refer to substantive charges re fees.  

frequent trust deposit request regarding fees & costs
 

PAYMENT

Prior to commencement of representation, the attorney will quote the amount requested as a trust deposit against which attorney's fees and costs may be billed.  The requested trust deposit will be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of your case.

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES

LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT
 
 
$     750    
$     100    
 
transcript of court proceedings not required
hearing common
trust deposit request

including attorney's fees & litigation costs - excluding travel
map * travel policy - time & expenses * travel rates
 

OR

$850*

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES

LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT
 
$          750   
$          250   
 
transcript of court proceedings required
hearing common
trust deposit request

including attorney's fees & litigation costs - excluding travel
map * travel policy - time & expenses * travel rates

$1,000*

collateral attack defense
* this shall not constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate

Client authorization is obtained for any large cost expense.  Final expenditure may run less or client may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. 

Client will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized billing statement when there has been activity on the account.  At the end of each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and remaining trust proceeds are refunded.

trust deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when retained

attorney does not accept installment payments

regular billings are scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is withdrawn

 
PARTIAL LIST OF POTENTIAL COSTS
out of pocket costs are the responsibility of the client
note: costs change & below cost information may be obsolete
link to Colorado Judicial Branch website -  current costs information published by state
COLORADO STATE COURT COSTS & FILING FEES
direct link to criminal or traffic court costs - costs change & lists may be obsolete
COUNTY COURT CRIMINAL COSTS DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL COSTS
    Potential Expenses
Price   Client Background Search
Varies   DMV Out of State Driving Record
10.00   Accident Report
20.00   Offense Report
10.00   DA Office discovery packet - estimate (actual may be more or less)
25.00   State court jury deposit - C.R.Crim.P. 23, CRS 16-10-109 (non-refundable except by acquittal)
10.00   Court records search & copy costs (actual may be more or less)
10.00   Copy expense at courthouse for prior offense files (estimate - may vary)
75.00   Public Service supervision fee
37.50   OJW fee to court (outstanding judgment warrant) - anticipating Integral Recoveries collection agency referral costs
95.00   DMV reinstatement fee
4.40   DMV clearance letter - certified copy of Colorado driving abstract
500.00   Private Investigator initial retainer - if relevant - variable based upon number of witnesses to interview
200.00   Law enforcement 911 / dispatch records, tapes & transcript - widely variable
200.00   Subpoena process service expense - depends on number of subpoenas issued
$3 per page   Transcriptionist - law enforcement 911 / dispatch audio files & investigator interview audio recordings if relevant
Varies   On-line legal research - dependent upon issues requiring legal research, if any
Rates   Travel time and expenses if the case is outside El Paso County
    depending upon the facts, it may be prudent to retain an accident reconstruction expert
    Alcohol or Substance Testing & Testimony if Relevant
150.00   Toxicology - BAC Ethanol (alcohol) only
200.00   Toxicology - BAC Ethanol (alcohol) + NaFl (preservative)
consult counsel or lab
 
  Toxicology - UA qualitative or quantitative toxicology screen for marijuana, substance quantitative toxicology screen for marijuana or
                         qualitative and quantitative drug screen
3,000
 
  Laboratory - Toxicologist testimony hourly fees and travel mileage  -  if expert testimony relevant  -  rates as of 5/24/05
                          misdemeanor hourly rate $350 - 5 hours travel time + minimum 1.5 hours court time

Depending upon the seriousness of the charges and factual circumstances, it may be prudent to place law enforcement 911 * dispatch tapes and records, plus other law enforcement records under subpoena duces tecum.  Expense will depend upon the amount of time the law enforcement agency spends searching dispatch tapes and records.

CAVEAT: Not all above costs will be relevant to any given case, and additional expenses not identified may be incurred in any individual case.  Costs quoted are subject to change by independent providers; actual costs paid will be billed.  *limited search pricing*  Absent knowledge of specific facts, no realistic cost estimation can be made in a collateral attack case regarding court transcripts of testimony or exhibits in underlying proceedings.

 
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 
First Consultation Accounting Structure Hourly Fees Costs Flat Fee - Definition
Settlement Phase Contested Phase Settlement Flat Fee Trial Flat Fee
Flat Fees - Phases Earned Compare Hourly vs Flat Fees Client's Election Final Travel Time & Expenses
Security for Fees & Costs Trust Account Withdrawal or Termination Alternatives to Private Counsel
Client Duty to Disclose Omission or Non-Disclosure Attorney Selection Retaining Gustafson Advice by Laymen

Thank you for considering my services; I appreciate your inquiry.

please feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation

DISCLOSURES
Privacy
 
Notice & Disclaimer
 
Ethics & Client Disclosures
 applicable whether site visitor
reads or not

 
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter

PRIMARY WEBSITE

 

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL WEBSITES

DUI DEFENSE - DWAI & DEAC DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE MIP - UNDERAGE ALCOHOL TRAFFIC TICKET DEFENSE DRIVING UNDER RESTRAINT SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
HIT AND RUN DEFENSE DRIVER LICENSE DEFENSE CRIMINAL DEFENSE PROSTITUTION DEFENSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEFENSE
SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS NUISANCE FORFEITURE DEFENSE SHOPLIFTING - THEFT DEFENSE
FAMILY LAW DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE COLORADO DIVORCE LEGAL SEPARATION STEP-PARENT ADOPTION GRANDPARENT ADOPTION
PATERNITY - LEGAL PARENTAGE CHILD SUPPORT SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS DEBT COLLECTION PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

 MAJOR SEARCH ENGINES

All the Web AltaVista AOL Search Ask Jeeves - Teoma Bing - Microsoft Network Dogpile
Excite Google HotBot InfoSeek - Go LookSmart Lycos
Netscape Overture Search WebCrawler Yahoo!  
 

 Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip Codes

80918 80920 80919 80917 80915 80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912 80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945 80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997

Website Copyright © 2003 - All Rights Reserved - Document Revised July 22, 2010
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright © Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date: January 29, 2010

Hit Counter